Ancient Romes Animal Cruelty For Entertainment In The Amphi

Ancient Romes Animal Cruelty For Entertainment In The Amphi-Theatre Essay The Romans are often characterized as loving violent and cruel entertainment in the amphitheatre. It has been suggested that the games served the dual purpose of providing entertainment for the people and maintaining the political status quo. In todays society, the killing of humans and animals usually means a jail term, and seeing someone die is not something people go and see for fun. Violence was glorified in Rome hundreds of years ago. All the crimes they committed were condoned, accepted and glorified. There were four different genres of such entertainment in the games held in amphitheatres (Amphi-theatres are outdoor arenas. theatres in the round: Amphi- meaning round in Greek.) : Gladiatorial combat, the theatrical execution of foreigners, beast shows, as well as chariot racing. Watching someone or a beast kill another was applauded for the method, skill, or artistry used in the slaughter. The games themselves provided ways for Rome to demonstrate the power of their empire, as huge investments of wealth, time, and emotion was put into the games. Death became a spectator sport with the viewers and the viewed both contributing to a wild and gory performance. Already by the late Republic magistrates were spending huge amounts of money on these games. The Latin word for gladiatorial games is Munus which means obligatory offering. This reflects the origin of these games as funerary offerings to the dead. While magistrates in the Republic may well have put on games to gain popular favo ur, this was in their private capacity and not as magistrates. Only gradually did the gladiatorial shows come to be assimilated with the games put on by magistrates. While the most popular games were chariot racing and simulated naval battles, fights in the amphitheatres, shown in these mosaics include gladiator V gladiator, gladiator V animal (pic 2) and animal V animal, were a common feature. Less common, but not infrequent was the release of wild beasts from the pits into the arena where hundreds of criminals had earlier been positioned. These spectacles all deeming to be very entertaining to spectators. Throughout the history of the Republic, there was a difference between the gladiatorial contests and other forms of spectacular entertainment. The Romans did not invent the concept of gladiatorial fighting; there is some uncertainty as to the exact source. One ancient source says it was the Etruscans, a non-Indo-European people who lived directly north of the Romans. Games that the state sponsored were called Ludi and held quite frequently. They never involved armed single combat, were associated with the worship of a god and were paid for (in part) by the public treasury. The Gladiatorial contests (Munera Gladiatorial) were sponsored and paid for privately, held very infrequently and were associated with funeral rituals. In A.D 70, the emperor Vespasian began construction on the site of a drained lake, of the largest amphitheatre in Rome, the Colosseum. The word Colosseum comes from a colossal statue of Nero that once stood near the stadium. The Colosseum could seat up to 50, 000 spectators, including the dignitaries, their guests, their slaves, a select number of common people, and foreigners (people who did not hold Roman citizenship). Commoners, slaves and foreigners were seated in the hottest place right under the canvas roof. After nine years of building by slave labour, the Colosseums opening ceremonies, including the Inaugural games, in A.D. 80 involved spectacles held for 100 days in which 9, 000 animals and 2,000 gladiators were killed, all for the delight of the crowd. In such a cultural climate, gladiatorial games were immensely popular and a characteristic symbol of Roman culture for almost seven centuries. Adopted from the earlier Etruscans, perhaps by way of Campania, Gladiatorial Games / Munera were introduced to Rome in 264 BC, and originated in the rites of sacrifice due the spirits of the dead and the need to propitiate them with offerings of blood. The were the obligatory funerary offerings owed to important men at their death, the first time being when the sons of Junius Brutus honoured their father by matching three pairs of gladiators. Traditionally, Munera among ancient Romans, gladiators (usually slaves or captives trained for the purpose), fought, usually to the death with swords or other weapons at public shows. The more harm the gladiators inflicted the bigger hero he was, and the more respect he gained. A vessel too fragile EssayCircus Maximus was also used because the Empire had trouble conveying information to an ignorant public without mass media at its disposal. The Circus Maximus allowed emperors an opportunity to announce new laws, taxes and inform the public on some of Romes à hot gossip. These bloody forms of entertainment served an important political function, helping maintain the political status quo. The administration saw it as important, as it assisted in teaching the local Romans how to fight in preparation for visits outside their empire, and to display the strength and courage of the Roman citizen to unemployed visitors to the city of Rome. In the growth of Munera, political competition among aristocrats was an important factor. Elections continued, and members of the ruling class continued to compete for the peoples affection through the offering of magnificent shows. The terms of competition were somewhat different. It was expected that everyone give games upon taking up office, and public funds were offered to help defray the cost both of purchasing gladiators from professional trainers and acquiring splendid beasts. But the magistrate was expected to add to this sum, and inscriptions were set up commemorating particularly splendid shows. There was great pressure to make your Munus more impressive than the last. During the Republic, gladiatorial combats brought great popularity to the giver of the games, their aim to increase their votes at election time. Julius Caesar in 65 BC, the year of his Aedileship, planned to give a gladiatorial exhibition consisting of 320 pairs of fighters. Although this exhibition was a Munus in memory of his father, Caesar was seeking to win political favour for his candidacy for the praetor ship. Although we know it was expensive to stage a gladiatorial show, no one has so far noted how expensive. Money had to be spent on prize money for the winners of these games (Gladiatorial Contests, Chariot Racing), or buying the animals for the shows. The endless blood lust of the spectators, populus and emperors alike, the brutality of the combat, and the painful deaths of men and animals are seen as cruel today, but the administration had these games to show the public of their cities the culture of war, discipline, and death. The gladiator demonstrated the power to overcome death and instilled in those who witnessed it the Roman virtues of courage and discipline. Gladiatorial games in the amphitheatres and entertainment in Circus Maximus have major significance to the way the Romans ordered their lives. Like any other form of ritual, these contests were implicitly understood by the Romans to express a message important to their social order and that message involved violence, death, and power.